Preparing undergraduate students for career success through case study writing and implementation in real job contexts

Francisco Gerardo Barroso Tanoira


The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of a procedure to train undergraduate students to write and implement case studies for improving their learning experiences, adapt to the labor environment and be better prepared for career success.

Method. Undergraduate students in social service internships at the Higher State Auditing Office in the states of Yucatan, Campeche and Q. Roo, in the Southeast of Mexico, under the guidance of Government Auditors, designed case studies to be implemented with their classmates following the procedure studied in this document, prepared by the author of this research.                      

Results. Results showed that after this experience, implementer students were more motivated for learning, more interested in case studies, more confident at working with others and were satisfied with learning. This was compared to the learning through traditional methods, according to their perception.                       

Conclusion.This case study procedure is effective for preparing students for improving their technical and socio-emotional competencies in their preparation for career success, but also a professional development opportunity for the Auditors. Learning to write and implement cases help learning and adaptation to work environment. It is learning how to learn and be prepared for career success through experiences such as this in real job contexts. 



case studies; cases; learning processes; knowledge management; professional success

Full Text:



Aceves, M. A. & Barroso, F. (2016), “Competencias socioemocionales en las prácticas profe-sionales. Un estudio en la industria hotelera” [Socioemotional Skills in Business Practice. A Study in the Hotel Industry], in Educación y Ciencia, num. 45, vol. 5, pp. 34-49.

Barroso, F. (2010), Factores a considerar para desarrollar la creatividad en las empresas. Un estudio en 70 empresas en la ciudad de Mérida, Yucatán. Proceedings of the XV Interna-tional Congress of Accounting, Administration and Informatics. School of Accounting and Administration, National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Barroso, F. (2011), Gestión del conocimiento en empresas y organizaciones sociales productivas exitosas en el estado de Yucatán. Proceedings of the XVI International Congress of Ac-counting, Administration and Informatics. School of Accounting and Administration, Na-tional Autonomous University of Mexico.

Brent, W. G. (1996), “What is a constructivist learning environment?” In W.G. Brent (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments. Case studies in instructional design, pp. 1-5. Eng-lewood Cliffs, NJ, Educational Technology Publications.

Choi, B. & Lee, H. (2002), “Knowledge management strategy and its link to knowledge creation process”, in Expert Systems with Applications, num. 23, pp. 173-187.

Creswell, J. (2003), Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach-es. U.S.A., Sage Publications

Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L. (1998), Working knowledge.

How organizations manage what they know, U.S.A., Harvard Business School Press.

Ellet, W. (2007), The case study handbook. How to read, discuss and write persuasively about cases, U.S.A., Harvard Business School Press

Carnegie Mellon University Eberly Center (2015), “Case studies”. Available at (retrieved on December 10th, 2016)

Flavell, J.H. (1978), “Metacognitive development”. In J.M. Scandura & C.J. Brainerd (Eds.). Structural process models of complex human behavior, Holland, Sifthoff y Noordhoff.

Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action, U.S.A., Harvard Business School Press.

Hernández, R.; Fernández, L. & Baptista, P. (2014), Metodología de la investigación [Metho-dology of Research], 6th. Ed, México, McGraw Hill.

Honebein, P. C. (1996), “Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments”. In W.G. Brent (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments. Case studies in instructional design, pp. 11-24. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Educational Technology Publications.

Nonaka & Takeuchi, H. (1995), “La organización creadora de conocimiento” [The knowledge creating organization]. New York, Oxford University Press.

Peters, R. G. (2012), “Differences Between Traditional and Progressive Education”. Wingra School. Available at (retrieved on November 27th, 2016).

Robbins, S. y Judge, T. (2013), Comportamiento organizacional [Organizational Behavior] (15th. Ed.), México, Pearson.

Robinson, K. (2010), Changing Paradigms [Video]. Available at (retrieved on September 30th, 2016).

Sveivy, E.K. (2001), Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in (retrieved on January 12th, 2013).

The University of New South Wales. (2013), “What is a case study?”, in



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017


Nova Scientia is a multidisciplinary, electronic publication that publishes biannually in the months of May and November; it is published by the Universidad De La Salle Bajío and aims to distribute unpublished and original papers from the different scientific disciplines written by national and international researchers and academics. It does not publish reviews, bibliographical revisions, or professional applications.

Nova Scientia, year 10, issue 21, November 2018 – April 2019, is a biannual journal printed by the Universidad De La Salle Bajío, with its address: Av. Universidad 602, Col. Lomas del Campestre, C. P. 37150, León, Gto. México. Phone: (52) 477 214 3900, e-mail: Chief editor: Ph.D. Ramiro Rico Martínez. ISSN 2007 - 0705. Copyright for exclusive use No. 04-2008-092518225500/102, Diffusion rights via computer net 04 - 2008 – 121011584800-203 both granted by the Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor.

Editor responsible for updating this issue: Direction of Research Department of the Universidad De La Salle Bajío, last updated on November 23th, 2018.