Evaluation of two feeding programs on productive traits and foot injuries in commercial turkeys

Ronald Santos Ricalde, José Segura Correa, Israel Palma Ávila, Carlos Sandoval Castro, Luis Sarmiento Franco


Introduction: Many factors affect live weight gain and carcass yield in poultry. Among those, feeding program, sex and diseases are the most relevant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a high protein (HP) and a low protein (LP) feeding programs in male and female turkeys on liveweight, carcass yield and foot injuries.

Method: The high protein (HP) program consisted in diets with a higher content of crude protein than those of the low protein (LP) program, although the metabolizable energy was similar in both programs. Liveweight gain, carcass yield and foot injuries were evaluated. A complete randomized design with factorial arrangement and 128 replicates per treatment were used. The statistical analysis included the effects of the feeding program, sex and the interaction.

Results: The turkeys from the HP program were heavier (P<0.05) than those from the LP program at 15 and 19 weeks of age (10.0 vs 9.1 and 13.1 vs 11.9 kg, respectively). The male turkeys were heavier (P<0.05) than the females at those ages (10.6 vs 8.4; 14.7 vs 10.4 and 17.4 vs 11.8 kg, respectively). Carcass yield was also significantly greater (P<0.05) for males than for females at 19 and 23 weeks of age (78.8 % vs 77.6 % and 78.2 % vs 77.5 %, respectively). Foot injuries grade 2 (>1.5 cm of diameter) were more frequent (P<0.06) in the HP (28.3%) than in the LP (18.1%) program, and in males (P<0.05). Additionally, as turkeys got older, foot injuries grade 2 were more frequents (34.9, 37.8 y 60.2% for turkeys at weeks 15, 19 and 23 of age; P<0.05).

Conclusion: The results indicated that turkeys raised in the HP program were heavier, and that males were heavier and yielded more carcass than females. Frequency and severity of foot injuries were highest in HP program, in males and in older turkeys.


turkeys; carcass yield; foot injuries; feeding program; liveweight

Full Text:



Bilgili, S.F., Alley, M.A., Hess, J.B., Nagaraj, M. (2006). Influence of age and sex on footpad quality and yield in broiler chickens reared on low and high density diet. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 15(3):433-441.

Erbil, E., Mehmet, M., Sedat, A. (2006). Growth curve establishment for American bronze turkeys. Archiv fur Tierzucht Dummerstorf 49 (3):293-299.

Fanatico, A.C., Pillai, P.B., Hester, P.Y., Falcone, C., Mench, J.A., Owens, C.M., Emmert, J.L. (2008). Performance, liveability, and carcass yield of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Science 87(6):1012-1021.

Havenstein, G.B., Ferket, P.R., Grimes, J.L., Qureshi, M.A., Nestor, K.E. (2007). Comparison of the performance of 1966- versus 2003- type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: growth rate, liveability, and feed conversion. Poultry Science 86(2):232-240.

Havenstein, G.B., Ferket, P.R., Qureshi, M.A. (2003). Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 versus 2001 broiler diets. Poultry Science 82(10):1509-1518.

Huffman, K., Zapata, I., Raddish, J.M, Miburn, M.S., Wick, M. (2012). Feed restriction delays developmental fast skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain isoforms in turkey poults selected for differential growth. Poultry Science 91(12):3178-3183.

Hybrid (2013). Hybrid nutrient guidelines 2013 commercial program (8 phases). Hendrix Genetics Company. http://www.resources.hybridturkeys.com/nutrition/commercial-guidelines

INEGI. (2013). Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Información por entidad. Yucatán. Territorio. Clima. http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/yuc/territorio/clima.aspx. Consultado el 15/ 05/2013.

Juárez, A., Fraga, L.M. (2002). Nota preliminar de indicadores productivos de pavos mexicanos en condiciones de confinamiento. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola 36(1):65-68.

Kjaer, J.B., Su, G., Nielsen, B.L., Sorense, P. (2006). Foot pad dermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens and degree of inheritance. Poultry Science 85(8):1342-1348.

Krautwald-Junghanns, M.E., Ellerich, R., Mitterer-Istyagin, H., Ludewig, M., Fehlhaber, K., Schuster, E., Berk, J., Petermann, S., Bartels, T. (2011). Examinations on the prevalence of footpad lesion and breast skin lesion in British united turkeys big 6 fattening turkeys in Germany. Part I: prevalence of foot pad lesions. Poultry Science 90(4):555-560.

Lamme, A., Frackenpohl, U., Petri, A., Mayert, H. (2006). Response of male BUT big 6 turkeys to varying amino acid feeding programs. Poultry Science 85(4):652-660.

Laudadio, V., Tufarelli, V., Dario, M., Emilio, F.P.D, Vicenti, A. (2009). Growth performance and carcass characteristics of female turkeys as affected by feeding programs. Poultry Science 88(4):805-810.

Lopez, K.P., Schilling, M.W., Corzo, A. (2011). Broiler genetic strain and sex effects on meat characteristics. Poultry Science 90(5):1105-1111.

Mazanowski, A. (1999). Growth to 12 weeks of age of geese from experimental flocks compared with purebred Koluda White geese. Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki 26(1):73-86.

Mazanowski, A. (2000). Rearing performance of quadruple crossbreds produced using white Koluda and regional varieties of geese. Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki 27(4):65-83.

Nagaraj, M., Wilson, C.A.P., Hess, J.B., Bigili, S.F. (2007). Effect of high-protein and all-vegetable diets on the incidence and severity of pododermatitis in broiler chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16(3):304-312.

Nahashon, S.N., Adefope, N., Amenyenu, A., Wright, D. (2005). Effects of Dietary Metabolizable Energy and Crude Protein Concentrations on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of French Guinea Broilers. Poultry Science 84(2):337-344.

Nestor, K.E., Anderson, J.W., Valleman, S.G. (2005). Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkey lines. 3. Growth-related measurements on live birds. Poultry Science 84(9):1341-1346.

NRC. (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th reviewed edition. National Academy Press; Washington, DC.

Pérez, L.E., Camacho, E.M., García, L.J., Machorro, S.S., Ávila, S.N., Arroyo, L.J. (2013). Mathematical modeling of the native Mexican turkey’s growth. Open Journal of Animal Science 4(3):305-310.

Segul, T., Kiraz, S. (2005). Non-Linear models for growth curves in large white turkeys. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science 29(2): 331-337.

STATGRAPHICS Plus 4.1. (2000). Professional Edition. Statistical Graphics Corp; Rockville USA.

Vasilatos, Y.R., Bacon, W.L., Nestor, K.E. (1988). Relationship of plasma growth hormone to growth within and between turkey lines selected for differential growth rates. Poultry Science 67(5):826-834.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v9i19.863


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017

Nova Scientia, year 9, issue 19, November 2017 – April 2018, is a biannual journal printed by the Universidad De La Salle Bajío, with its address: Av. Universidad 602, Col. Lomas del Campestre, C. P. 37150, León, Gto. México. Phone: (52) 477 7108500, e-mail: http://nova_scientia.delasalle.edu.mx. Chief editor: Ph.D. Rolando Pérez Álvarez and Ph.D. Ramiro Rico Martínez. ISSN 2007 - 0705. Copyright for exclusive use No. 04-2008-092518225500/102, Diffusion rights via computer net 04 - 2008 – 121011584800-203 both granted by the Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor.

Editor responsible for updating this issue: Direction of Research Department of the Universidad De La Salle Bajío, last updated on Nov 2th, 2017.