Resource based-theory: a bibliometric analysis

Carlos Fong Reynoso, Karina Edith Flores Valenzuela, Luz Melina Cardoza Campos

Abstract


The Resources and Capabilities Theory (RCT) is one of the main theoretical models that guide the research conducted in Strategic Management, and its use is growing. This trend, which began in the eighties of the last century, by various factors, among which acceptance is explained within the academic community associated with strategic management, economic arguments used in this approach to explain the behavior and performance of the company, and in particular mechanisms for building and maintaining competitive advantage. The RCT considers that the provision of a competitive advantage says that the company has reached a higher level of performance than its competitors, a situation that allows you to make abnormal profits, even in the long run. In this sense, build and sustain a competitive advantage is the key to success of the company and indicates how efficiently the company uses its resources and capabilities.

Method: In order to verify that the ideas mentioned above and in particular that what is indicated by Barney et al. (2011) is still valid and corresponds to the publications in the field, a bibliometric data analysis is performed for the period 2011-2015 (August ). The data were obtained from the Scopus database and analyzed using Excel software. This analysis identifies the main research topics that are treated in the CRT, as well as the trend that continues in its development. The method and software used is similar to that used in several bibliometric analyzes reported in the international literature (Ramos-Rodríguez and Ruíz-Navarro 2004, 2008, González-Albo and Zulueta 2007, Portugal Ferreira, Ribeiro Serra, Kramer Costa, and Almeida 2016 and Acevedo, N., Jiménez, L. and Rojas M. 2017)

Results: The data obtained show a growing generation of empirical confirmatory test, application development and contribution of the RCT to the development of other disciplines.

Conclusion: Strengthening and maturity of the RCT is manifested through publications identified in this analysis of bibliometric data. While the field of RCT is broad and does not allow to deepen in all its dimensions, it can be concluded that the results obtained in this study confirm that it is correct perception of the RCT as one of the most important theoretical models for research performs in strategic management.

Keywords


RCT; resources; capabilities; competitive advantage

References


Anderson, B., & Eshima, Y. (2013). The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 413-429.

Abebe, M., & Angriawan, A. (2011). The internationalisation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): A multi-level integrative framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 377-397.

Antero, M., & Riss, P. H. (2011). Strategic management of network resources: A case study of an ERP ecosystem, International. Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 7(2), 18-33.

Baraldi, E., Gressetvold, E., & Harrison, D. (2012). Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 266-276.

Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.

Barney, J. B. (Abril de 2012). Purchasing, Supply Chain Management and Sustained Competitive Advantage: The Relevance of Resource-based Theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 48(2), 3-6.

Barney, J. B., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, Vol 27, 625-43.

Barney, J. B., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management,, 77(5), 1299-1315.

Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256-280.

Bhattacharyya, S., & Jha, S. (2015). Mapping micro small and medium enterprises from the resource-based view and dynamic capability theory perspectives and innovation classification. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 25(3).

Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55-73.

Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902.

Camisón, C., & Villar-Lopez , A. (2012). On How Firms Located in an Industrial District Profit from Knowledge Spillovers: Adoption of an Organic Structure and Innovation Capabilities. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 361-382.

Chabowski, B. R., Mena, J. A., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958-2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 55-70.

Chadwick, C., Super, J. F., & Kwon, K. (2015). Resource orchestration in practice: CEO emphasis on SHRM, commitment-based HR systems, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 360-376.

Che Senik, Z., Mat Isa, R., Md Sham, R., & Ayob, A. H. (2014). A model for understanding SMEs internationalization in emerging economies. Journal Pengurusan, 41, 25-42.

Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1429-1443.

Crook, T. R., Todd , S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J. (2011). Does human capital matter? a meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443-456.

Cui, M., & Pan, S. L. (2015). Developing focal capabilities for e-commerce adoption: A resource orchestration perspective. Information and Management, 52(2), 200-209.

D'Angelo, A., Majocchi, A., Zucchella, A., & Buck, T. (2013). Geographical pathways for SME internationalization: Insights from an Italian sample. International Marketing Review, 30(2), 80-105.

Dao, V., Langella, I., & Carbo, J. (2011). From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 63-79.

Daou, A., Karuranga, E., & Su, Z. (2013). Intellectual capital in Mexican SMEs from the perspective of the resource-based and dynamic capabilities views. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(6), 1673-1688.

De Azevedo Ferreira De Souza, M. C., Mazzali, L., De Silveira R., L. F., & Bacic, M. J. (2014). Long stay of small industrial firms in the market: An analysis from the literature and empirical. Gestao e Producao, 21(1), 157-170.

Di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Verona, G. (2014). The organizational drivetrain: A road to integration of dynamic capabilities research. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 307-327.

Fainshmidt, S., S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: A Meta‐Analytic evaluation and extension. Journal of Management Studies.

Fayard, D., Lee, L. S., Leitch, R. A., & Kettinger, W. J. (2012). Effect of internal cost management, information systems integration, and absorptive capacity on inter-organizational cost management in supply chains. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 168-187.

Flatten, T. C., Greve, G. I., & Brettel, M. (2011). Absorptive capacity and firm performance in SMEs: The mediating influence of strategic alliances. European Management Review, 8(3), 137-152.

Fong, C. (2003). Rol que juegan los activos intangibles en la formación de ventaja competitiva sustentable en la PyME: un estudio de casos con empresas de Jalisco y Cataluña. (Http://www.Tdx.Cesca.es/TDX-1202103-144211) Universidad Autónoma De Barcelona.

Fong, C. (2005). La teoría de recursos y capacidades, Fundamentos microeconómicos. Guadalajara, Jal. Méx: Universidad de Guadalajara.

Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (Marzo de 2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1-23.

Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2012). Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 998-1022.

Gnizy, I., Baker, W. E., & Grinstein, A. (2014). Proactive learning culture: A dynamic capability and key success factor for SMEs entering foreign markets. International Marketing Review, 31(5), 477-505.

Golicic , S. L., & Smith, C. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 78- 95.

Guerras-Martín, L. A., Madhok, A., & Montoro-Sánchez, A. (2014). The evolution of strategic management research: Recent trends and current directions. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), 69-76.

Hakanen, T. (2014). Co-creating integrated solutions within business networks: The KAM team as knowledge integrator. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(7), 1195-1203.

Hayter, C. S. (2013). Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: Perspectives from the literatura. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 899-911.

Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 8-31.

Hermann, P. (2005). Evolution of Strategic management: the need for new dominant designs. International Journal of management reviews, 7(2), 111-130.

Hoffmann, V. E., Bandeira-de-Mello, R., & Molina-Morales, F. X. (2011). Innovation and Knowledge Transfer in Clustered Interorganizational Networks in Brazil. Latin American Business Review, 2(3), 143-163.

Jenssen, J. I., & Nybakk, E. (2013). Inter-organizational networks and innovation in small, knowledge-intensive firms: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(2), 1350008-27.

Jimenez-Barrionuevo, M. M., Garcia-Morales, V. J., & Molina, L. M. (2011). Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity. Technovation, 31, 190-202.

Lin, Y., & Wu, L. Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 407-413.

Liu, X., Wang, J., & Ji, D. (2011). Network characteristics, absorptive capacity and technological innovation performance. International. Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 11(2), 97-116.

Lofsten, H. (2014). Product innovation processes and the trade-off between product innovation performance and business performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1), 61-84.

McGahan, A. M., & Porter, M. E. (1997). How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal, 15-30.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480-1495.

Mills, A. M., & Smith, T. A. (2011). Knowledge management and organizational performance: A decomposed view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 156-171.

Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N., & Sambamurthy, V. (2011). How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 35(1), 237-256.

Mithas, S., Tafti, A., Bardhan, I., & Goh, J. M. (2012). Information technology and firm profitability:Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(1), 205-224.

Newbert, S. L. (Febrero de 2007). Empirical Research on The Resource-Based View of the Firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121-146.

Nyberg, A. J., Moliterno, T. P., Hale, D., & Lepak, D. P. (2014). Resource-Based Perspectives on Unit-Level Human Capital: A Review and Integration. Journal of Management, 40(1), 316-346.

Nyberg, A. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). Context-emergent turnover (CET) theory: A theory of collective turnover. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 109-131.

Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Peteraf, M., Di Stefano, G., & Verona, G. (2013). The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1389-1410.

Ployhart, R. E., Nyberg, A. J., Reilly, G., & Maltarich, M. A. (2014). Human Capital is dead; Long life Human Capital Resources! Journal of Management, 40(2), 371-398.

Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.

Priem, R. L., & Swink, M. (2012). A Demand-side Perspective on Supply Chain Management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 7-13.

Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm in Competitive Strategic Management, Lamb R. Prentice-Hall.

Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167-185.

Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D., & Teece, D. J. (1991). Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 5-29.

Schoenherr, T., & Swink, M. (2012). Revisiting the arcs of integration: Cross-validations and extensions. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1-2), 99-115.

Shi, V. G., Koh, S. L., Baldwin, J., & Cucchiella, F. (2012). Natural resource based green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 17(1), 54-67.

Sirmon, D., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37, 1390-1412.

Soriano, I., & Pinillos, M. (s/a). Análisis bibliométrico del corporate entrepreneurship: indicadores de la producción.

Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource‐based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907-934.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (August de 1997). Dynamic capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Tien, C., & Chen, C. -N. (2015). The power of momentum on firm performance: A myth or a reality? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(3), 452-468.

Tzortzaki, A. M., & Mihiotis, A. (2014). A Review of Knowledge Management Theory and Future Directions. Knowledge and Process Management, 21(1), 29-41.

Ulaga, W., & Reinartz, W. J. (2011). Hybrid offerings: How manufacturing firms combine goods and services successfully. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 5-23.

Vallejo-Alonso, B., García-Merino, J. D., & Arregui-Ayastuy, G. (2015). Motives for financial valuation of intangibles and business performance in SME. Innovar, 25(56), 113-127.

Vivas-Lopez, S., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Oltra, V. (2013). Learning, knowledge and dynamic capabilities: Theoretical implications for competitiveness and innovation in the 21st century. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 14(4), 259-270.

Wang, C., Hong, J., Kadouros, M., & Wright, M. (2012). Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(7), 655-676.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.

Wright, M., Clarysse, B., & Mosey, S. (2012). Strategic entrepreneurship, resource orchestration and growing spin-offs from universities. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 24(9), 911-927.

Young, M. N., Tsai, T., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Ahlstrom, D. (2014). Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2),




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v9i19.739

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Nova Scientia

Nova Scientia, year 9, issue 19, November 2017 – April 2018, is a biannual journal printed by the Universidad De La Salle Bajío, with its address: Av. Universidad 602, Col. Lomas del Campestre, C. P. 37150, León, Gto. México. Phone: (52) 477 7108500, e-mail: http://nova_scientia.delasalle.edu.mx. Chief editor: Ph.D. Rolando Pérez Álvarez and Ph.D. Ramiro Rico Martínez. ISSN 2007 - 0705. Copyright for exclusive use No. 04-2008-092518225500/102, Diffusion rights via computer net 04 - 2008 – 121011584800-203 both granted by the Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor.

Editor responsible for updating this issue: Direction of Research Department of the Universidad De La Salle Bajío, last updated on Nov 2th, 2017.