Water, poverty and time allocation in Mexico: A comparative analysis for the design of a doubledividend policy
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Palabras Clave
Agua
Pobreza
Uso del Tiempo
Doble diviendo
México water access
poverty alleviation
scarcity
double-dividend
Mexico

How to Cite

Guevara Sangines, A. E., & Lara Pulido, J. A. (2015). Water, poverty and time allocation in Mexico: A comparative analysis for the design of a doubledividend policy. Nova Scientia, 7(15), 462–481. https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v7i15.134

Abstract

Introduction: Water scarcity and pollution affect large sectors of the population, but they occur excessively on the poor. Access to water has been recognized by the United Nations as a fundamental right (UN, 2010), thus if the government does not grant universal access to water, it would be preventing the full realization of Human Rights. The relationship between water availability and poverty is of great importance for the public health and social equity. This essay studies the relationship between lack of access to water, the time dedicated to work and income levels

Method: With information taken from two waves of the National Survey on Time-Use 2002 and 2009 (INEGI) it is estimated the gap in income and hours worked among people who allocated time fetching water and those that did not perform this activity by a propensity score matching method, which considers personal characteristics and municipality level characteristics.

Results: In both cases, there is a statistically significant difference, its lower in 2009 than in 2002, however it persists. Caeteris paribus, in the first case, the household income-gap was of 18% in 2002 and of 12% in 2009. In the second, the time allocated to work of a person who carries water decreased about 13% in 2002 and about 10% in 2009. These results suggest that the lack of access to water is a condition that has a significant impact in making a person more susceptible to fall into a condition of poverty. Discussion or

Conclusion: Thus, a public policy aiming at increasing water supply coverage will directly increase beneficiaries’ wellbeing while alleviating their poverty levels by increasing time devoted to productive activities. Water provision then, yields a double dividend. We estimate the net present value of the cost of providing a new water connection at household level (5,305 pesos) and the net present value of the additional income that would rise if a person does not have to carry water. We found that investing in water provision is cost effective a valuable way to reduce poverty

https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v7i15.134
PDF (Español (España))

References

Referencias

Bosch C., K. Homman, C. Sadoff y L. Travers (2002). Agua, saneamiento y pobreza, Washing-ton, D.C.: Banco Mundial.

Breña, F. A. (2004). Gestión integral del recurso agua. En M. A. Villa y E. Saborio (coords.). La gestión del agua en México: los retos para el Desarrollo Sustentable. (pp. 39-54) México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Briscoe, J., D. Whittington, M. A. Altaf, P. F. Decastro, C. Griffin, A. Okorafor, A. Okore, B. Singh, R. Ramasubban, P. Robinson y V. K. Smith (1993). “The Demand for Water in Rural-Areas - Determinants and Policy Implications”, en World Bank Research Observer, 8 (1): 47-70.

Cameron, A. C. y P. K. Trivedi (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

CDESC, Observación general Nº núm. 15 (2002), El derecho al agua (artículos 11 y 12 del Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales), 29º período de sesiones, Comité sobre Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales.

CONAPO (2005). Índices de Marginación 2005, Ciudad de México: CONAPO.

CONEVAL (2007). Los mapas de Pobreza en México: Anexo técnico metodológico, Ciudad de México: CONEVAL.

CONEVAL (2014). Medición de la pobreza, sitio web. México: CONEVAL. Disponible en www.coneval.gob.mx

Flores, M. L. (2002). “La medición de la pobreza en México”, Boletín del CESOP, Núm 1.

Guevara, A. (2003). Pobreza y Medio Ambiente en México: Teoría y evaluación de una teoría pública, Ciudad de México: UIA/INE/INAP.

Guevara, A., G. Soto y J.A. Lara (2009) “Pobreza y agua”, El Agua en México: Cauces y Encau-ces. México: UNAM.

Howitt, R. E., J. Medellín-Azuara (2008) “Un modelo regional agrícola de equilibrio parcial. El caso de la cuenca del Río Bravo” en El agua en México: Consecuencias de las políticas de intervención en el sector, H. R. Guerrero, A. Yúnez-Naude y J. Medellín-Azuara (comp.), Ciudad de México: FCE.

INEGI (2000). Censo General de Población y Vivienda 2000, Ciudad de México: INEGI.

INEGI (2002). Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo, Ciudad de México: INEGI.

INEGI (2005). II Conteo de Población y Vivienda 2005, Ciudad de México: INEGI.

INEGI (2006). Encuesta Nacional de Ingreso-Gasto de los Hogares 2006, Ciudad de México: INEGI.

INEGI (2006). Estadísticas a Propósito del Día Mundial del Agua: datos nacionales, Ciudad de México: INEGI.

INEGI (2010). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010, México: INEGI.

Izazola, H. (2001). “Agua y sustentabilidad en la Ciudad de México”, en Estudios demográficos y urbanos, 16 (2): 285-320.

Lidonde, R. (2004). Scaling up School Sanitation and Hygiene Promotion and Gender Concerns. Artículo presentado en School Sanitation & Hygiene Education Symposium, Delft, Hol-anda.

North, J. H. y C. C. Griffin (1993). “Water Source as a Housing Characteristic - Hedonic Proper-ty Valuation and Willingness-to-Pay for Water”, en Water Resources Research, 29 (7): 1923-1929.

OECD (1987). Pricing of water services, Paris, Washington, D. C.: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

PNUD (2006). Human Development Report 2006, Beyond Scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis, Nueva York: UNDP.

Rijsberman, F. R. (2004). “Water Scarcity: Fact or Fiction?” New Directions for a Diverse Planet, Fourth International Crop Science Congress, 26 September–1 October, Brisbane, Aus-tralia.

Rosenthal, S. (2001). The Manila water concessions and their impact on the poor, New Heaven, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.

SEMARNAT (2008). Estadísticas del Agua en México, Edición 2008, Ciudad de México: SE-MARNAT.

Sen, A. (1984), “Poor, Relatively Speaking”, en Resources Values and Development, Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. (1991). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Singh, B., R. Ramasubban, R. Bhatia, J. Briscoe, C. C. Griffin y C. Kim (1993). “Rural Water Supply in Kerala, India: How to Emerge from a Low-Level Equilibrium Trap”, en Water Resources Research, 29 (7): 1931-1942.

UNICEF (2006). Progreso para la Infancia: Un balance sobre agua y saneamiento, Nueva York: UNICEF.

WB (2008). Climate Resilient Cities: A Primer on Reducing Vulnerabilities to Climate Change Impacts and Strengthening Disaster Risk Management in East Asian Cities. [En línea]. Disponible www.worldbank.org/eap/climatecities

WHO, WHO/UNICEF Joint Water Supply/Sanitation Monitoring Programme, Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council and UNICEF (2000). Global water supply and sanitation assessment 2000 report, Geneva, Switzerland, New York:World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund.

World Bank (1992). World development report 1992: Development and the environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2015 Nova Scientia